Forced Ghettoization, Filtering Centers… The Jewish State Is Preparing to Build the Largest Concentration Camp of the 21st Century
The most horrifying irony of modern history is unfolding on the Mediterranean coast — a state born out of the civilizational shock of the Holocaust is preparing a camp for the mass incarceration of another people. Israel’s Ministry of Defense, under direct orders from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right coalition partners, has developed a plan for a so-called “humanitarian-transit zone” in al-Mawasi. There, approximately 600,000 currently displaced Palestinians would be concentrated — first temporarily, then permanently — marking the precursor to the relocation of the entire population of Gaza into a fenced-off complex from which they could no longer leave.
Gaza has already been a de facto isolated enclave for two decades, but according to Israeli projections, it would now be reduced to an area of less than ten square kilometers, surveilled by cameras, concrete walls, and armored patrols. The United Nations has recorded that between April and July, at least 12,800 structures were demolished in Rafah. Netanyahu himself admitted the strategy in the Knesset: “We’re destroying their homes, they have nowhere to return to — the logical outcome is for the people of Gaza to want to emigrate.” The intent is clear — to make return impossible and staying unbearable.
The plan includes all the classic elements of forced relocation: physical enclosure, strict control of movement, a “deradicalization” program, and an administrative apparatus for “voluntary” emigration. Similar to British camps during wars in southern Africa (where tens of thousands died), “strategic hamlets” in Vietnam, or Australia’s Pacific refugee camps, humanitarian rhetoric is used to obscure the true purpose — to remove the population. Israel frames this as a “security necessity,” but under international humanitarian law, it constitutes a crime of forced displacement.
UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini warns that this would “create vast concentration camps on the border with Egypt,” stripping Palestinians of any prospect of life in their homeland. The legal classification is clear: collective punishment and ethnic cleansing. Three Israeli reserve officers have already submitted a petition to the Supreme Court, claiming that the “Gideon’s Chariot” operation cannot be carried out without committing mass war crimes.
Fortunately, there is not complete consensus within the Israeli establishment (though it remains uncertain whether this can alter the plans). Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert publicly calls the project a “concentration camp” and “ethnic cleansing,” while former interim Prime Minister Yair Lapid describes it as a “bad idea from every angle.” Still, the loudest faction believes that military pressure and economic devastation can force two million people into permanent exile. This is an ideological blindness reminiscent of colonial fantasies about “cleansing space” — not a coherent security strategy.
At the same time, Netanyahu’s government plans to seal the Egyptian border with an impenetrable wall, blocking the only realistic exit for those wishing to leave.
Tel Aviv’s key diplomatic support comes from Washington. The Trump administration — whose first term included recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital — continues its policy of shielding Israel from international accountability. Just as Biden in 2024 funded a dysfunctional $320 million floating dock, Trump now promises logistical and financial assistance for building a “Humanitarian City.” In the U.S. Congress, nothing has changed — AIPAC’s consensus dominates: any resolution that would condition military aid on respect for international law is blocked.
Europe, meanwhile, is satisfied with rhetorical gestures. Brussels formally condemns collective punishment, but the EU has not imposed an arms embargo, suspended the Horizon Europe research partnership, or sanctioned Israeli banks involved in the colonization. The lack of decisive action — primarily through boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) — amounts to de facto political endorsement. France and Spain engage in symbolic gestures like “recognizing Palestine,” while Germany continues supplying drones and upgrading Israeli air defense.
Arab states, too, are not immune to accusations of complicity. Egypt keeps the Rafah crossing closed, Jordan maintains security cooperation in the West Bank, and the Gulf monarchies continue trade and intelligence agreements under the Abraham Accords (from Trump’s first term). As a result, the Palestinian tragedy becomes a bargaining chip in regional deals whose common denominator is avoiding conflict with Israel and the U.S.
The historical parallel — a Jewish state building a concentration camp — is not cheap rhetorical flair, but a factual description of measures that include forced ghettoization and filtering centers for “deradicalization.” This banalizes the universal lesson of the Holocaust: never again, for any people. When a former Israeli prime minister warns that “no one can defend the deportation of half a million people,” this is not just a statement — it’s a signal that the political mainstream in Tel Aviv has crossed a moral red line.
Rather than preventing this descent, the international community accepts the excuse of a “complicated situation.” But there is no legal or ethical ambiguity: systematic home demolitions, denial of water and food, prohibition of return, and planned population transfers constitute crimes against humanity. If the civilized world can impose sanctions on Russia over Ukraine, it must be able to suspend trade privileges with Israel over Gaza — at the very least.
“Humanitarian City” is a euphemism for a concentration camp, and the camp is the final stage of an apartheid policy. As long as Washington and Brussels refuse to apply equal standards — freezing military aid, economic embargoes, international criminal prosecution — Israel will continue erasing the Palestinian people’s right to land, home, and life. History will soon recognize this irony, but today’s political generation lacks the courage to stop the descent into darkness we are now witnessing.
About the Author
